I see in the title that the history stackexchange site is still in beta.

It went way past its 100 days of beta, why it is still in beta?

share

1 Answer 1

up vote 8 down vote accepted

As I understand it, there isn't really a 100 day deadline. They do want to see progress by the end of that period though. Apparently we had enough for SE to keep us going. There was a fair bit of discussion on this topic in my question How are we doing?

There certianly has been steady progress since then. Sadly, now that I'm a moderator I'm not supposed to be giving out details of such things, but my answer to What Can We Do To Improve the Site has several updates gathered from public data. You can compare that to our current Area 51 stats and see for yourself.

My personal hope is that we come out of Beta sometime in the next six months. I have no special knowledge backing this up, mind you. However, I like the vector we're on.

share
3  
90 days is the minimum period a site can stay in beta, and there's no upper limit. Personal Finance and Money has been in beta for 914 days, for example. –  Yannis Rizos Feb 4 '13 at 17:23
    
well, SE being open source it's in perpetual beta, so maybe it's an honorary title :) –  jwenting Feb 5 '13 at 6:57
    
@T.E.D. just curious: Do you have to sign some non-disclosure-agreement (or similar) when becoming a StackExchange moderator? –  Drux Feb 5 '13 at 13:42
2  
@Drux There is a moderator agreement you are supposed to agree to. It seems more like a TOS than a full-blown legal agreement though. Mostly I suspect it is to protect them when(if) they decide to terminate your mod privs for some reason. –  T.E.D. Feb 5 '13 at 14:00
2  
@Drux The mod agreement is public: history.stackexchange.com/legal/moderator-agreement –  Yannis Rizos Feb 6 '13 at 3:14
2  
@jwenting SE is not open source. –  Yannis Rizos Feb 6 '13 at 3:15
    
As a software engineer I can categorically state beta is the worst word computer science ever gave to the English language. When software is in use, by definition it is not beta, so calling it "beta" is just dumb. It is like people who put "Under Construction" notices on their web site. Look, if you have a crappy car, you don't need to put a bumper sticker on it that says, "Sorry, I have a crappy car." We don't need to be apologizing for the site. Take the dump beta thing off. –  Tyler Durden Jun 17 at 19:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .