I am proposing that we as a community make a commitment to answer half of the Unanswered Questions currently on the site. There are 51 as of today, October 25th, which gives us almost 45 days to answer the said questions. That is less than a question a day. I commit to answering at least two of these questions.
I like your goal and I'm happy to participate. However, we are ahead of the required number of answers to get out of beta. We need to have at least 90% answered, and we currently have 94% answered.Our problem is not getting enough questions.
I'd rather see everyone contribute at least one question by the end of November. We ned to be averaging 15 questions per day, but we are currently at 2.5. They identify 5 per day as a low point that needs work, and we are doing only half of that. More questions means a better likelihood that we will get more people coming back to answer them, and that is what will get us out of beta.
Backing up Hauser's comment to another answer here...
IMHO once our visits per day get high enough, the rest of the stats will probably take care of themselves.
I was just looking at this yesterday. Our visits per day is now more than twice what it was when I first asked about this back in the wake of the mass-beta closings six months ago. On May 3 (2012), Steve Drennon reported it as 341, and it is right now 881. I betcha that if we can get that up into the "Excellent" range of 1500 or more (legitimately, not by having folks hit the reload button all day), everything else will naturally improve enough that we'll get ourselves out of beta.
IMHO, if you want to help that along the best things to do are:
Google ranks websites in its searches by amount and quality of incomming links to them, so #2 is very important to driving traffic into here.
I like our trend here; we just have to keep improving.